Legal Opinion

Boland v. Overlade

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1956No. 0-453PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner has filed original action in this court in which he has petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus against the warden of the Indiana State Prison where petitioner is confined.

This court is without jurisdiction to entertain the proceedings as it is well settled the Supreme Court has no original jurisdiction of actions for writ of habeas corpus. There is ample *707jurisdiction in nisi prius courts to issue such writs in proper cases, with remedy by appeal to this court if the writ is erroneously denied. See: State ex rel. Taylor v. Dowd, Warden (1944), 222 Ind. 289, 53 N. E. 2d 543.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Dowd, WardenIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Dowd, WardenIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hickey v. ESTATE OF HICKEY ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hickey v. ESTATE OF HICKEY ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API