Legal Opinion

Smith v. State ex rel. Hamill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1894No. 17,116PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.

The appellee filed, in this court, a petition to dismiss the appeal herein, for the reason following, to wit: “Because of the failure of appellants to comply with rule 3Í of this court, in this, to wit,, that no marginal notes are placed on the transcript, in their appropriate places,'indicating the pleadings, exhibit’s, *199orders of the court, bills of exceptions, and names of witnesses; nor are there any marginal notes of motions and rulings of the court.”

Rule 31 of this court is as follows:

“XXXI. The appellant shall cause the transcript to be paged and the lines of each page to be numbered.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Criterion GroupIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Franklin v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. McDonald v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Citizens' Street Railway Co. v. DammIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API