Legal Opinion
Herendeen v. Michigan State Police
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided February 3, 1999No. 1:97-cv-00158PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Michael Herendeen (“Heren-deen”) and Bradley Breedveld (“Breed-veld”), are employed by the Michigan State Police (“MSP”) as troopers. Heren-deen and Breedveld filed these consolidated actions against the MSP and Colonel Michael Robinson (“Robinson”) alleging “reverse discrimination” in promotional eligibility and consideration for promotions in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution pursuant to 42…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Celestine v. Petroleos De Venezuella SACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Marc E. Bacon v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Dubuc v. Green Oak TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Vredevelt v. Geo Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Velez v. MARRIOTT PR MANAGEMENT, INC.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.