Hoffman v. Paper Converting MacHine Co.

MEMORANDUM

TUCKER, District Judge.

Presently before this Court: are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 31), Plaintiffs Response (Doc. 51), Defendants’ Reply and Supplemental Reply thereto (Doc. 68 and Doc. 72), and Plaintiffs Sur-Reply (Doc. 79). For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Jeff J. Hoffman (“Plaintiff’) brings this action to recover damages for an injury incurred when the fingers of his right hand were drawn into the unguarded in-running nip point between the anilox roll and the plate roll…