Legal Opinion

Stien v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 14, 1997No. 960798-CAPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORME, Judge:

Plaintiff Cassedy Stien appeals the dismissal, on summary judgment, of her complaint for invasion of privacy growing out of the screening of a tasteless video at a company party. We affirm.

FACTS 1

At the center of this case is a videotape for which defendants are responsible, in which seventeen employees of defendant Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. (Marriott), whose properties include Summit Watch in Park City, describe in detail a household chore they hate doing. The video includes appearances by nine men and eight women, including plaintiffs husband, Brad Bauman. The video does…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Crump v. Beckley Newspapers, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cain v. Hearst Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Leslie Fudge v. Penthouse International, Ltd., Leslie Fudge v. Penthouse International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Romaine v. KallingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mink v. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Jacob v. BezzantUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Hamilton v. PrewettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. McKenzie v. Allconnect, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  5. SHATTUCK OWEN v. Snowbird Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API