Stien v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
ORME, Judge:
Plaintiff Cassedy Stien appeals the dismissal, on summary judgment, of her complaint for invasion of privacy growing out of the screening of a tasteless video at a company party. We affirm.
FACTS 1
At the center of this case is a videotape for which defendants are responsible, in which seventeen employees of defendant Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. (Marriott), whose properties include Summit Watch in Park City, describe in detail a household chore they hate doing. The video includes appearances by nine men and eight women, including plaintiffs husband, Brad Bauman. The video does…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Crump v. Beckley Newspapers, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Cain v. Hearst Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Leslie Fudge v. Penthouse International, Ltd., Leslie Fudge v. Penthouse International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Romaine v. KallingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mink v. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Jacob v. BezzantUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Hamilton v. PrewettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- McKenzie v. Allconnect, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- SHATTUCK OWEN v. Snowbird Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.