Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Holy Rosary Credit Union

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 28, 1995No. 93-455PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The plaintiff, Robert J. Arthur, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Mohl, J.), granting the motion of the defendant, Holy Rosary Credit Union (Holy Rosary), for a directed verdict on all counts of the plaintiffs negligence claim. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Holy Rosary hired Credit Union Building Corporation (CUBC) to oversee and coordinate the construction, design, and furnishing of its new building in Rochester. CUBC charged a fee of three-and-one-half percent of the approximately $650,000 cost of construction. Although CUBC did not involve itself in the manner or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cloutier v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Amabello v. Colonial MotorsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Thomas v. HarringtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
  4. Carr v. Merrimack Farmers Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
  5. Elliott v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Acosta v. United States Marshals ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. King v. Lens Creek Ltd. PartnershipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Fischer v. HooperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. Suarez v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Laramie v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API