McCordic v. Crawford
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
EDMONDS, J., Dissenting
By the decision of a majority of this court, the appellant is deprived of a remedy peculiarly within the province of the trial judge to grant, which it had sought with1 due diligence in proper form and which the trial judge had decided should be given. In arriving at this conclusion, the majority opinion emphasizes but one of the two dates which start the running of the 60-day jurisdictional period within which the trial court is empowered to grant a motion for a new trial. The filing of the notice of intention to move therefor also starts the running of that period,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Dickey v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.