Legal Opinion
Sexton v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided September 4, 2020No. 3:17-cv-00482Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LEROY SEXTON CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO.: 17- 482-JWD-RLB EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, ET AL RULING ON DEFENDANT FLOWSERVE US INC.’S DAUBERT MOTION AND/OR MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT, MICHAEL EDWARD SAWYER Before the Court is the Daubert Motion and/or Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiff’s Expert, Michael Edward Sawyer (Doc. 238) brought by defendant Flowserve US Inc. (“Defendant” or “Flowserve”). It is opposed by plaintiff Leroy Sexton (“Plaintiff” or “Sexton”). (Doc. 258.) Flowserve filed a reply…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Thomas Pipitone, and Bonnie Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc., Biomatrix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.