Legal Opinion

Robins v. Roberts

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1932No. 5137PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

In this suit plaintiff by two causes of action sought to restrain defendant (a) from maintaining on his land a cement dam or headgate thereby causing the waters of Kay’s creek to back up and overflow its banks and flood a portion of plaintiff’s land; and (b) from maintaining a row of willow trees along the boundary common to plaintiff’s land and defendant’s land, and from permitting the roots and branches thereof to extend into and over plaintiff’s land. Plaintiff also prayed for damages on each cause of action. Defendant’s defense to the first cause of action was set out by way of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Corea v. HigueraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Brasington v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. North Point Consolidated Irrigation Co. v. Utah & Salt Lake Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Stephens Ranch & Live Stock Co. v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Scarborough v. WoodillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Garcia v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Hubble v. Cache County Drainage Dist. No. 3Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Levine v. BlackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. SRB Investment v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API