Legal Opinion

North Carolina Equipment Company v. DeBruhl

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 1976No. 7510SC602PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in its holding that defendant was not liable on the note.

G.S. 25-3-403(2) provides as follows:

“An authorized representative who signs his own name to an instrument(b) except as otherwise established between the immediate parties, is personally obligated if the instrument names the person represented but does not show that the representative signed in a representative capacity, or if the instrument does not name the person represented but does show that the representative signed in a representative capacity.”…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dorton v. DortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Maine Gas & Appliances, Inc. v. SiegelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Kuhns v. CoussementCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Murphy v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Guaranty National Bank v. BeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API