Legal Opinion

Guaranty National Bank v. Beaver

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 20, 1987No. 62842PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

This case involves construction of 12A O.S. 1981 § 3-403, a provision of the Okla homa Uniform Commercial Code. Along with his corporation, defendant Beaver was sued individually on a promissory note signed:

Spring Mountain Investment, Inc. (typed)

Luther Joe Beaver (signed)

Luther Joe Beaver (typed)

Query: In the suit by a Bank who was the assignee of the note, can Beaver show by parol evidence that his signature was as an authorized representative of the corporation rather than as an individual? The trial court held that he could, and gave the bank judgment only against the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Colonial Refining Co. v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. National Investment & Security Co. v. CoreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. American Exchange Bank, Collinsville, Okl. v. CessnaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Moore v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mountain America Credit Union v. McClellanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  2. Accounts Management Corp. v. Lyman RanchMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Berry v. Pentecost, Jr.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API