Legal Opinion
Maine Gas & Appliances, Inc. v. Siegel
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 24, 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, Justice.
The plaintiff, Maine Gas & Appliances, Inc., commenced an action against the defendant, Harris B. Siegel, seeking to recover a sum due under a promissory note which the defendant had allegedly signed in an individual capacity. As executed, the note took the following form:
PROMISSORY NOTE
For value received, the makers hereon, jointly and/or severally shall pay the order of Main Gas & Appliances, Inc., on demand, the sum of Five thousand Six hundred, Sixty-Three and 07/100 Dollars, ($5663.07), together with interest thereon at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Industrial National Bank v. Leo's Used Car Exchange, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Tinker v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Moore v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- North Carolina Equipment Company v. DeBruhlCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. LedgerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Rodriguez v. Mellon Bank, N.A. (In Re Rodriguez)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Jaffe v. NoceraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Tennessee Wildcat Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- In re BG Petroleum, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.