Legal Opinion
Gentry v. Jett
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided June 1, 1959No. Civ. A. 1472PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, Chief Judge.
The defendant, Charles R. Jett, has moved the court to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff, Albert Frank Gentry, and for cause has alleged:
1. That the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted in that as shown therein the claim of plaintiff is based upon alleged damages for personal injuries received by him in an accident that occurred on June 22, 1958, near Tulsa, Oklahoma, when a truck belonging to the defendant and being driven by the plaintiff collided with a St. Louis-San Fi'ancisco Railway Company freight train at a crossing on Oklahoma…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Baltimore & OR Co. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Cain v. Quannah Light & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Kravas v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Eberle v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Albright v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Blunt v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1963
- Pillo v. Reading CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Albert Frank Gentry v. Charles R. JettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Hartsfield v. SEAFARERS INTERN. UNION, ETC.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1977