Legal Opinion
Jungquist v. Sheikh Sultan Bin Khalifa Al Nahyan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 20, 1996No. Civil Action 95-1005 (CRR)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is the defendants’ renewed Motion to Dismiss on the grounds of immunity, lack of subject matter and personal jurisdiction, and forum non conveniens. The Court denied the defendants’ previous Motion to Dismiss in order to allow limited jurisdictional discovery. Based on the pleadings, the entire record herein, the law applicable thereto, and for the reasons expressed below, the Court shall grant in part and shall deny in part the defendants’ renewed Motion to Dismiss.
BACKGROUND
The Allegations
This case involves a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tara Ann Jungquist v. Sheikh Sultan Bin Khalifa Al NahyanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Daventree Ltd. v. Republic of AzerbaijanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- MMA Consultants 1, Inc. v. Republic of PeruDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Tachiona Ex Rel. Tachiona v. MugabeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Gonzalez Paredes v. VilaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.