Legal Opinion

Pham v. American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 7, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01781Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 KHOA PHAM, et al., CASE NO. 2:24-cv-01781-RSL 9 Plaintiffs, v. 10 11 AMERICAN FAMILY CONNECT ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 12 INSURANCE COMPANY, F SO TAR T A E MM EO NR TE DEFINITE 13 Defendant. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss and for a 16 More Definite Statement.” Dkt. # 7. Having reviewed the motion and the remainder of the 17 18 record, the Court finds as follows: 19 BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiffs allege that they…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API