Pham v. American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 KHOA PHAM, et al., CASE NO. 2:24-cv-01781-RSL 9 Plaintiffs, v. 10 11 AMERICAN FAMILY CONNECT ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 12 INSURANCE COMPANY, F SO TAR T A E MM EO NR TE DEFINITE 13 Defendant. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss and for a 16 More Definite Statement.” Dkt. # 7. Having reviewed the motion and the remainder of the 17 18 record, the Court finds as follows: 19 BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiffs allege that they…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.