Legal Opinion
Norlander v. Schleck
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 13, 1972No. 3-71 Civ. 340PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
This civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeks a declaratory judgment and injunction against the Commissioner of the Civil Service Bu reau of the City of St. Paul, Minnesota and his subordinate personnel director. Plaintiff asserts that the defendants’ actions in denying her placement on the Civil Service .Bureau eligible list for municipal employment, based on alleged undisclosed “unsatisfactory references”, violated plaintiff’s XIV Amendment due process rights to be fairly considered for public employment and to the protection of her employment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dziewior v. City of MarengoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Griffin v. CareyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Mathias v. City of Milwaukee Department of City DevelopmentDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1974
- Tumulty v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.