Mathias v. City of Milwaukee Department of City Development
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.
This is an action brought under the Civil Rights Act in which plaintiff claims that his right to free speech has been abridged. Plaintiff grounds his complaint in the first and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution.
The facts bear restating. On or about October 9, 1972, the plaintiff secured a position as a Rehabilitation Specialist I with the City of Milwaukee Department of City Development (hereinafter re ferred to as “Department”). It was understood that plaintiff’s job was to commence at a later date. On November 9, 1972,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Katherine Amen v. City of Dearborn, a Municipal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Gustafson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Gustafson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Perrote v. PercyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1978
- Williams v. PoseyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.