Legal Opinion

United States v. Brewington

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 18, 2008No. 07-1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

In early 2006, while serving a state prison sentence in Indiana, Randall Brewing-ton received word that he had been indicted on criminal charges in federal court. The notice he received was in a detainer filed against him by the United States Marshal. Upon its filing, Brewington tried to assert his rights under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), which would have required that he be brought to trial within 180 days of the receipt of his demand by the “prosecuting officer” and the “appropriate court.” The “prosecuting officer,” here the office of the United States…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. HutchinsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1980
  3. United States v. Richard Leslie ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Victor Guy JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. James PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Bowling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State of Maine v. Christopher ShepardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
  5. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API