Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fink

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 2011No. 1808 MDA 2010PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J:

George Harold Fink, Sr., appeals the trial court’s order denying his petition for collateral relief pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546. Fink contends that the court erred in denying his request for reinstatement of his direct appeal right and in addressing the merits of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC) in accordance with the test enunciated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), and adopted in Commonwealth v. Pierce, 515 Pa. 158, 527 A.2d 973 (1987). Following careful…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CallahanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. RosadoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. Rosado, F., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Lukens v. FrancoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Lukens v. FrancoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API