Lukens v. Franco
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CLINGMAN, Justice.
{1} In this appeal of the district court's denial of habeas corpus, Petitioner David Lukens, Jr. claims ineffective assistance of appellate counsel in his direct appeal and requests a new appeal or reversal of his conviction. We consider (1) whether prejudice due to deficient performance of Petitioner's attorney should be presumed or whether Petitioner must prove that actual prejudice occurred on direct appeal and, (2) if there was prejudice, whether the remedy should be a new appeal. Although the performance of Petitioner's appellate counsel on direct appeal (Appellate…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. RojoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Norman Elmer Miller v. J.C. Keeney, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SloanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. CainNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. GreenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2025