Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Leyden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 16, 1930No. 7 Div. 959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The appeal seeks to review the action of the trial court in overruling demurrer to the cross-bill.

The original bill had for its purpose the removal of a cloud upon the title of real property. The respondent is called upon to set forth and specify her right, title, claim, interest, and incumbrance upon said land, “and how and by what instrument the same is derived and created.” Complainant alleges that respondent has no such right, interest, or incumbrance upon said land, and prays that upon final hearing the court will decree that she owns the lands in fee simple, and, if mistaken in this,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grayson v. MuckleroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Porter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Graves v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Libby v. WinstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Powell v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hacker v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Dozier v. Troy Drive-In-Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Reid v. ArmisteadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Long v. Monroe County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Rountree v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API