Fegelson v. Niagara Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants, Niagara Fire Insurance Company, Lafayette Fire Insurance Company, Traders’ Insurance Company and New York Fire Insurance Company from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Bunn, J., overruling their demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
The plaintiff brought this action against six fire insurance companies to recover on six separate policies of insurance covering his stock of merchandise, furniture, and fixtures, each company issuing one policy. The complaint alleges, in effect, that each of the defendants is a foreign corporation doing a fire insurance business in this state; that at the time of the issuing of each of the polices and until the loss thereunder the plaintiff was engaged in business in the city of St. Paul, and owned a stock of merchandise and store furniture and fixtures; that before February 24,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hanover Fire Insurance v. Alexander Brown & SonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- M. Pretzfelder & Co. v. Merchants' InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Home Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
- Bardwell v. Conway Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Tisdale v. Three Insurance CompaniesMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Parkway, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. FosterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- Dixie Fire Insurance v. American Confectionery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Alliance Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. JamersonDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.