Legal Opinion

Womack v. McQuarry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1867PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from tlie Decatur Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, J.

— The appellant sued the appellee to recover rents. The facts were that the appellant, on the 7th of March, 1864, owned a saw-mill and a woolen factory. The two buildings were separate, but side by side. The machinery of both was propelled by water drawn from the pool of one dam, but each had its separate forebay and water wheel. On that day, the saw-mill and one room of the factory building (for a carpenter shop,) which had an entrance from the saw-mill, were leased to the appellee for three years, the appellee agreeing to pay quarterly therefor the sum of three hundred dollars per annum.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graves v. . BerdanNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Winton v. CornishOhio Supreme Court · 1832

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Krause v. Brd. of Trustees of the School CrothersvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Wattles v. South Omaha Ice & Coal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Harrington v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Whitaker v. HawleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Japhet v. PolemanakosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API