Legal Opinion

Suesserman v. Newark Bd. of Adjustment

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 12, 1960PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

61 N.J. Super. 28 (1960)

160 A.2d 143

HENRY SUESSERMAN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND SIDNEY STEINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 15, 1960.

Decided April 12, 1960.

Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and FOLEY.

Mr. John J. Dios argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Grasso, Agresti & Dios, attorneys).

Mr. George R. Handler argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.

This appeal is taken from a judgment of the Law…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grundlehner v. DanglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Tomko v. VissersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Andrews v. Ocean Twp. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Moriarty v. PoznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Mocco v. JobNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Burbridge v. Governing BodySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Bern v. Fair LawnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Farmer v. MeekerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Wajdengart v. Broadway-Thirty-Third Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API