Suesserman v. Newark Bd. of Adjustment
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
61 N.J. Super. 28 (1960)
160 A.2d 143
HENRY SUESSERMAN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND SIDNEY STEINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 15, 1960.
Decided April 12, 1960.
Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and FOLEY.
Mr. John J. Dios argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Grasso, Agresti & Dios, attorneys).
Mr. George R. Handler argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.
This appeal is taken from a judgment of the Law…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grundlehner v. DanglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Tomko v. VissersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Andrews v. Ocean Twp. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Moriarty v. PoznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Mocco v. JobNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Burbridge v. Governing BodySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Bern v. Fair LawnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Farmer v. MeekerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Wajdengart v. Broadway-Thirty-Third Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.