Legal Opinion
Bern v. Fair Lawn
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 16, 1961PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
65 N.J. Super. 435 (1961)
168 A.2d 52
BENJAMIN BERN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, BERGEN COUNTY, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND ROYAL INDUSTRIES CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, INTERVENER-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 14, 1960.
Decided February 16, 1961.
Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and KILKENNY.
Mr. Heyman Zimel argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.
Mr. Edward M. Schotz argued the cause for intervener-respondent, Royal Industries Corp. (Messrs. Shavick, Thevos and Schotz, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas F.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Brandon v. Board of Commissioners of MontclairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- ISKOS. v. Planning Bd. of Tp. of LivingstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Yahnel v. Bd. of Adjust. of JamesburgNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Deardorf v. Board of Adjustment of Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Saddle Brook Realty, LLC v. Township of Saddle Brook Zoning Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Hill Homeowners Ass'n v. Passaic Zon. Bd. of Adj.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.