Legal Opinion
Collado v. New Mexico Motor Vehicle Division
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 2005No. Nos. 23,938, 23,939PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
{1} Respondent (sometimes called Motor Vehicle Division or MVD) appeals from the district court’s granting of Petitioners’ petitions for writs of mandamus, ordering that their pleas of guilty to traffic offenses, made pursuant to signing uniform traffic citations, be withdrawn and that the metropolitan court proceed to trial on the matters. We first resolve jurisdictional questions concerning the finality of the orders from which the appeals are taken and the proper method of appellate review. We then summarily address the two issues raised in these cases, which are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carrillo v. RostroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. AhasteenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Guthrie v. Threlkeld Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. KurleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HeinsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BegayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- Vigil v. New Mexico Motor Vehicle DivisionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016