Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Carter

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 1996No. 19-11130PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DIANE WEISS SIGMUND, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is an objection to confirmation of the Debtor’s Chapter 13 plan filed by Lynda Styskal (“Styskal”), an unsecured creditor in the instant bankruptcy case. Styskal asserts, among other things, that the Debtor’s plan does not provide for the submission of all of the Debtor’s projected disposable income over the plan’s life and is not proposed in good faith. 1 Upon reviewing the Debtor’s schedules and considering the arguments of counsel, including those set forth in the post-trial briefs submitted by the parties, we believe…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
  2. In Re NavarroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Matter of BeltUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
  4. In Re KitsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
  5. In Re CardilloUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re RollandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2004
  2. In Re MacDonaldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. In Re McNicholsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  4. In Re BottelbergheUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  5. In Re MurphyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API