Legal Opinion
In Re Navarro
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 17, 1988No. 19-11026PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE I. FOX, Bankruptcy Judge:
This contested matter involves an unsecured creditor’s objection to the debtors’ chapter 13 plan on the sole ground that it does not meet the disposable income test set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b). The creditor, Philadelphia Federal Credit Union (“PFCU”), argues that because the debtors propose to continue to tithe to their church and send a child to parochial school during the period of their chapter 13 bankruptcy plan, their plan may not be confirmed because it does not commit all of the family’s disposable income to payments under the plan. Although I…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Hill v. Hill (In Re Hill)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- In Re SchnabelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Listecki Ex Rel. Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Cemetery Perpetual Care Trust v. Official Committee of Unsecured CreditorsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- In Re YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Kerney v. Capital One Financial Corp. (In Re Sims)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2002
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.