Law v. City of Danville
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
Leon Alfred Law asks us to reverse his conviction of driving’while intoxicated because he was denied the right to consult with his counsel before refusing to take a blood test. He relies on the right to assistance of counsel in criminal proceedings guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Federal Constitution and by Article I, § 8, of the State Constitution.
In Deaner v. Commonwealth, 210 Va. 285, 170 S.E.2d 199 (1969), we were asked to reverse a revocation of a driver’s license for failure to take a blood test on the same ground, denial of right to consult with counsel before…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Deaner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
- State v. PetkusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sites v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Forte v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- State v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- State v. CichowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.