State v. Cichowski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The dispositive issue in these appeals is whether an accused, who is charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a, has a sixth amendment right to counsel when deciding whether to submit to a chemical test of the alcohol content in his blood. The defendant was arrested on two separate occasions and each time charged with violating General Statutes § 14-227a. In the first case, after a jury trial, he was convicted and a fine of $500 plus costs was imposed by the trial court, DeMayo, J. In the second case, the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. PierreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Clark v. MuzioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. Neary-FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- State v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.