Legal Opinion

International Signal Co. v. Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 8, 1918PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On bill, &e.

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, V. C.

The first question to be determined is whether the word “sell,” used in the eighth paragraph of the agreement under consideration, is used in its strict legal sense so that a transaction to come within it must have been accompanied with delivery or passing of title, or whether it is used in a sense which would include a contract to sell. That it may be used in either sense is settled. The cardinal rule to be applied in construing a contract is to ascertain the intention of the parties. If more than one construction of the language used is possible, the circumstances surrounding the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bellisfield v. HolcombeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. Moran v. Fifteenth Ward B. L. Assn.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  3. Debrabant v. Commercial Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  4. Autographic Register Co. v. Philip Hano Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  5. Silverstein v. DohoneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API