Legal Opinion
Silverstein v. Dohoney
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 13, 1954PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
32 N.J. Super. 357 (1954)
108 A.2d 451
NATHAN SILVERSTEIN AND JULIAN SILVERSTEIN, T/A SILCO CIGARETTE SERVICE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
GEORGE DOHONEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 27, 1954.
Decided October 13, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.
Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Mr. Sol Schulman, attorney; Mr. Seymour Margulies, on the brief).
Mr. Abraham J. Slurzberg argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. Louis Bolstein, attorney; Mr. Maurice A. Cohen, of counsel).
Mr. Irving I.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- O'DONNELL v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Naumberg v. YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1882
- Ross v. OrrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- McKinney v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- De Witt County Public Building Commission v. County of De WittAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Silverstein v. Abco Vending ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Mount v. ReckaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Fenning v. American Type FoundersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.