Legal Opinion

In Re Robert M.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1985No. B004265PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Robert was declared a ward of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 1 after he admitted taking part in a burglary. He was placed on home probation on various conditions including: “Attend a school program approved by the Probation Officer without absence unless excused by parent, guardian, school authorities or Probation Officer. Maintain satisfactory grades and citizenship.” This is a standard probation condition in the Los Angeles County juvenile courts.

On two occasions Robert has been remanded to juvenile hall to serve…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. OylerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. HacklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. People v. Juan G.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. Kazuo G.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. People v. Angel J.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. In Re JuanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API