Legal Opinion
State v. DeBello
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 2, 1998No. 22942-1-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
After Steven DeBello failed to comply with the conditions of his sentence, the trial court sanctioned him by imposing 120 additional days of confinement with 90 days suspended. Holding that the trial court lacked authority to suspend a portion of the additional confinement term, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
DeBello’s original sentence for unlawful possession of a controlled substance, RCW 69.50.401(d), required that he advise the State of any change of address and pay $1,910 in monetary obligations. The trial court later amended the sentence to permit DeBello to perform additional community…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. Garcia-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- State v. ShoveWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. McDougalWashington Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- City of Spokane v. MarquetteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. NasonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.