Legal Opinion

Begay v. City of Tucson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1986No. 18222-PRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

The City of Tucson was adjudged liable in a wrongful death action brought by the plaintiffs Begays. The plaintiffs, upon behalf of the child, Gilbert Nez Begay, filed a motion for a new trial on the issue of damages. The trial court granted the motion because the award of damages to the child was inadequate. The City appealed. The Court of Appeals, Division Two, in a memorandum decision (2 CA-CIV 5259, filed May 16,1985) remanded the 'case for a new trial on the issues of both liability and damages. The Begays, on behalf of the child, Gilbert Nez Begay, petitioned this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Creamer v. TroianoArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Quinonez on Behalf of Quinonez v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Saide v. StantonArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Anderson v. MunizCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. City of Glendale v. BradshawArizona Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Valder Law Offices v. Keenan Law FirmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Wilmot v. WilmotArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  3. James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Duke v. Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists CharteredArizona Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API