Legal Opinion

Wilmot v. Wilmot

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2002No. CV-02-0130-PRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 Several months after Milton Wilmot died, his surviving wife brought a wrongful death action under Arizona’s Wrongful Death Act, A.R.S. §§ 12-611 to 12-613. The wife and her attorney knew that decedent had six adult children from a previous marriage, yet they settled the case without obtaining the consent of the children.

¶ 2 Those children challenged the settlement, asserting that by settling "without their knowledge and consent the wife breached a fiduciary duty owed to them as statutory beneficiaries. The trial judge denied their motion to set aside an order…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Fickett v. Superior Court of Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. In Re the Estate of MillimanArizona Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Coleman v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Willie G. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. Valder Law Offices v. Keenan Law FirmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. White Mountain Health Center, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API