Legal Opinion

Hankin v. Hankin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1985No. 122 E.D. Appeal Docket 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

507 Pa. 603 (1985)

493 A.2d 675

Harriet HANKIN, Estate of Samuel Hankin, Max Hankin, and Janet Hankin, Appellants,

Moe Henry HANKIN, Sabina Hankin, Perch P. Hankin, Gertrude Hankin, Benjamin R. Shanken and Pauline Shanken, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 23, 1985.

Decided June 4, 1985.

Theodore R. Mann, S. Mark Werner, Sheldon M. Bonovitz, Philadelphia, for appellants.

Franklin Poul, Burt M. Rublin, Philadelphia, for Max & Janet Hankin.

Philip D. Weiss, Norristown, Thomas A. Allen, Philadelphia, for Moe Henry Hankin, Sabina Hankin, Perch P. Hankin, Gertrude Hankin, Benjamin…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
Waddell v. ShriberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
Tate v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.