German Exch. Bank v. Kroder
New York Court of Common Pleas
Two actions by the German Exchange Bank against John Kroder. Defendant moves for consolidation of the actions. Granted.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
The motion is made by the defendant to consolidate two actions brought against him by the plaintiff. A similar motion was made at an earlier stage of the proceedings in these actions, at which time the plaintiff made a counter motion for judgment upon the answers, as frivolous. Both motions were considered at the same time, and disposed of in the same decision; the one for judgment being granted, while the one for consolidation was denied. Upon appeal the order allowing judgment was reversed (34 N. Y. Supp. 133), but the one refusing consolidation was not appealed from, and still stands, and,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Riggs v. . PursellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Veeder v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Belmont v. Erie Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1869
- Smith v. . ZalinskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Snyder v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1851
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kelley v. KelleyNew York Supreme Court · 1924