Legal Opinion

Charles Vayda v. County of Lake

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 2017No. 333495PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGadola, J.

This case requires us to reconcile provisions set forth by MCL 46.30a of the county boards of commissioners act (CBCA), MCL 46.1 et seq. , and MCL 35.402 of the veterans preference act (VPA), MCL 35.401 et seq . The issue on appeal is whether plaintiff, Charles Vayda, was entitled to notice and a hearing under the VPA before the termination of his employment with the Lake County Sheriff's Office after he became a member of the Lake County Board of Commissioners (the Board). We hold that the conclusion of plaintiff's employment as a sheriff's deputy did not trigger the notice and hearing…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Adair v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Johnson v. ReccaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Monat v. State Farm InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Charles Rudolph v. Sheryl LloydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Estate of Sanan Altaye v. Sa&r Trucking Company IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Farm Bureau General Insurance Company of Mich v. Omar Hyder KhanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Potter v. Harbor Springs, City ofDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
  5. Warren City Council v. Sonja BuffaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API