United States v. Bramel
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WERNER, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of forcible sodomy on a child under the age of sixteen on various occasions during a two year period, in violation of Article 125, of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 925 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ].1 His approved sentence included a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty years and reduction to the grade of Private El.
Appellant appeals a ruling of the military judge denying his motion for a new pretrial investigation…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BramelU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. JobsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989