Legal Opinion

United States v. Bramel

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 22, 1989No. ACMR 8701207PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WERNER, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of forcible sodomy on a child under the age of sixteen on various occasions during a two year period, in violation of Article 125, of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 925 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ].1 His approved sentence included a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty years and reduction to the grade of Private El.

Appellant appeals a ruling of the military judge denying his motion for a new pretrial investigation…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BramelU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. JobsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API