Legal Opinion

Merkley v. Schramm

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1966PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*140Wilkie, J.

To begin with it is necessary to consider appellant’s contention that the trial court did not comply with the provisions of sec. 270.33, Stats.,1 in that he did not render and file his decision on the cause within the sixty-day period prescribed by the statute. Although the court’s decision dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Richard Schramm was made directly from the bench at the close of testimony on December 10, 1964, his decision was not made dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Maxine Schramm until May 10, 1965. The findings of fact mention that briefs were filed and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heiden v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Galewski v. NoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Kamuchey v. TrzesniewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Lisowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Lealiou v. QuatsoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Eby v. KozarekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Megal v. Green Bay Area Visitor & Convention Bureau, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Frank v. StreeterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Hoeft v. FriedelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API