Galewski v. Noe
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
The appellants first contend that the reservations in the various deeds by the Calumet Land Company did not constitute a complete dedication of the land so reserved for a public highway. They contend that in Wisconsin five elements are necessary for a complete dedication: “(1) An absolute dedication; (2) a setting apart; (3) surrender to the public use of the land by the proprietors; (4) an acceptance; (5) a formal opening by the proper authorities or a use equivalent to such acceptance or opening.” They cite Mahler v. Brumder, 92 Wis. 477, 482, 66 N. W. 502, as authority therefor. In that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reilly v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- City of Ashland v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Cramer v. HanafordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. LeaverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Williams v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. La Follette v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Eby v. KozarekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Kamuchey v. TrzesniewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Cohn v. Town of RandallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.