Legal Opinion

Galewski v. Noe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1954PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The appellants first contend that the reservations in the various deeds by the Calumet Land Company did not constitute a complete dedication of the land so reserved for a public highway. They contend that in Wisconsin five elements are necessary for a complete dedication: “(1) An absolute dedication; (2) a setting apart; (3) surrender to the public use of the land by the proprietors; (4) an acceptance; (5) a formal opening by the proper authorities or a use equivalent to such acceptance or opening.” They cite Mahler v. Brumder, 92 Wis. 477, 482, 66 N. W. 502, as authority therefor. In that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reilly v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. City of Ashland v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Cramer v. HanafordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. State v. LeaverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Williams v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Eby v. KozarekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Kamuchey v. TrzesniewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Cohn v. Town of RandallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API