Legal Opinion

Robert Charest v. Hydraulic Hose & Assemblies, LLC

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 30, 2021PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision:

2021 ME 17

Docket: WCB-20-178 Argued: March 10, 2021 Decided: March 30, 2021 Panel: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. ROBERT CHAREST v. HYDRAULIC HOSE & ASSEMBLIES, LLC, et al. HUMPHREY, J. [¶1] In this appeal, we construe the Workers’ Compensation Act to determine whether the Act’s statute of limitations expired before Robert Charest petitioned for review of incapacity in 2017. [¶2] Charest appeals from a decision of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the decision of the WCB…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hird v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  2. Russell v. RUSSELL'S APPLIANCE SERVICESupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Stockford v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. Victor S. Urrutia v. Interstate Brands InternationalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  5. Bailey v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carol Brewster v. S.D. Warren/Sappi N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026
  2. Dennis G. Crosen v. Blouin Motors., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API