Legal Opinion

United States v. Roman G. Weninger

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1980No. 79-1161PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Weninger was convicted of a misdemean- or for failing to file federal income tax returns for the years 1973 and 1974 in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203. At trial, Weninger was permitted to appear pro se to conduct his defense. Weninger appeals to this court through an attorney, contending primarily that (1) his trial was conducted in violation of the Sixth Amendment because he was denied both the right to counsel and the right of confrontation, and (2) the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial in light of new evidence uncovered after the verdict. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. PomponioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Roy W. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Herman PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Wesley WillieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. State v. CrisafiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API