Legal Opinion

B. L. Assn. v. Hamilton (Et Al.)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The question to be answered in this case as a result of the appeal of Ethel M. Hamilton, one of the defendants, is whether the Deficiency Judgment Act of January 17, 1934, P. L. 243, 21 P. S., section 806, applies where a property is sold at sheriff's sale on December 23, 1933, before the passage of the act and the sheriff acknowledges the deed on February 8, 1934, after the act was in effect. The learned president judge of the court below held that the statute did not apply.

The act provides: "That whenever any real property is sold on any execution on the foreclosure of any mortgage, or on a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Stroup v. RaymondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Collins ex rel. Hill v. London Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Bellas v. M'CartySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  5. Grakelow v. NashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. Broad Street HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Marx Realty & Improvement Co. v. Boulevard Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. White's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. G.A.G. Corp. v. AurittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API