Legal Opinion
Grisim v. South St. Paul Live Stock Exchange
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 2, 1922No. 22,581PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Defendant appeals from an order restraining it from collecting a fine imposed upon plaintiff for a violation of its rules. Defendant is a corporation without capital stock and was organized pursuant to the provisions of chapter 138, p. 193, Laws of 1883, and acts amen-datory thereof, now embraced in sections 6536 and 6537, G. S. 1913. One of the objects 'for which it was organized was to facilitate and regulate the business of dealing in live stock at South St. Paul. It has 98 members, of whom ,plaintiff is one. Members pay an initiation fee of $5,000 and execute a bond of $20,000 to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Budd v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. OlsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Carnes v. St. Paul Union Stockyards Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Olson v. GuilfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Minnesota Trust Co. of Austin v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Farmers Cooperative Commission Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.