Legal Opinion
Minnesota Trust Co. of Austin v. Hatch
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1985No. CX-84-2055PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Appellant Minnesota Trust Company brought this declaratory judgment action against respondent Michael Hatch, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Commerce, alleging that Minn.Stat. § 46.-045 (1984) violates the contract clauses of the Minnesota and United States constitutions. Minnesota Trust appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of its action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We affirm.
FACTS
Minnesota Trust Company obtained a corporate charter from the State of Minnesota in 1945. The charter empowered Minnesota Trust to accept…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Midwest Family Mutual Insurance v. BleickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Anheuser-Busch Employees Credit Union v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
- Drewes v. First National Bank of Detroit LakesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Council No. 65 v. State, Public Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Laue v. Production Credit Ass'n of Blooming PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.