Legal Opinion
US Magnesium LLC v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 1, 2015No. Consol. 14-00038PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Judge:
This action involves an administrative review conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) of the anti-dumping duty order covering pure magnesium from the People’s Republic of China. See Pure Magnesium From the People’s Republic of China, 79 Fed.Reg. 94 (Dep’t of Commerce Jan. 2, 2014) (final results admin, review) (“Final Results”); see also Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review on Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic of China, A-570-832 (Dep’t of Commerce Dec. 26, 2013) (“Decision…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Qvd Food Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aristocraft of Am., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Hebei Jiheng Chem. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016