Tate v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.
This' case arises from the criminal conviction of appellant, Adam Tate, for manufacturing a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Appellant received a twelve-year prison term. On appeal, appellant argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We reverse and dismiss based on appellant’s first assignment of error.
Appellant and his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Tate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003