Legal Opinion

Tate v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 13, 2004No. CR 03-1441PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellant Adam Tate was convicted of stice. controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture, possession of drug paraphernalia, and maintaining a drug premise. The court of appeals reversed Tate’s conviction, holding that there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the testimony of his accomplices. However, because the court of appeals applied the wrong standard of review, we reverse that court and affirm Tate’s conviction.

On December 11, 2001, Little Rock Police officers…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McGehee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Purifoy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Fouse v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Baughman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Passley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. MacKool v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Fiting v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Hart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API